Alchemy discussion forum Home
Alchemy discussion forum > Request for information > Help required > “mountain sublime” and “open sea” epithets or metaphors?

 Moderated by: alchemyd  
AuthorPost
Alexandra Dumitrescu
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 6th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 5
Status:  Offline
Hi
 The “Stone” is described in the Rosary of Philosophers in oppositional terms : it “is miraculous and animated, splendid in colour, a Mountain sublime, and an open sea.” Would  it be incorrect to consider “mountain sublime” and “open sea” epithetes? Are they metaphors, rather? I'd say they are epithets, but I've heard someone say they are metaphors instead. Apologies: this is not exactly an alchemy question, but your help would be very gratefully received.
Thank you,
Alex

Paul Ferguson
Member


Joined: Fri Feb 15th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 1516
Status:  Offline
I would say they are both, and that it depends on how the phrases are used:

If I say 'The Stone is a Mountain Sublime' I am speaking metaphorically (i.e. I am saying that the Stone is like a Mountain Sublime)

If I say 'The Philosophers sought to ascend the Mountain Sublime' then I am using an epithet (i.e. I am referring to the Stone as a Mountain Sublime because this phrase is generally understood to mean 'the Stone').

As far as I can tell, all epithets are metaphors, but not all metaphors are epithets.

Alexandra Dumitrescu
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 6th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 5
Status:  Offline
Thank you, Paul. That's what I thought (that all epithets are metaphors).

So,  I suppose that in the context above "epithetes" should be replaced with "metaphors."

Last edited on Thu Nov 18th, 2010 06:15 am by Alexandra Dumitrescu

Paul Ferguson
Member


Joined: Fri Feb 15th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 1516
Status:  Offline
Yes, I think 'metaphors' would be better there.

Alexandra Dumitrescu
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 6th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 5
Status:  Offline
Thank you, Paul.




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez