Alchemy discussion forum Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 
Alchemy discussion forum > Welcome > Information about Alchemy discussion Forum > Statistics for the Alchemy Discussion Forum

Statistics for the Alchemy Discussion Forum
 Moderated by: alchemyd  
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
alchemyd
Administrator
 

Joined: Thu Sep 13th, 2007
Location: Glasgow, United Kingdom
Posts: 25
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Oct 22nd, 2008 05:11 am
 Quote  Reply 
There are only a small number of registered members of this discussion forum, however, it is open to the wider internet alchemical community to read the postings. Here is a chart of the latest statistics. It shows that the postings are being read widely and attests to the success of this method of serious scholarly discussion.

 

 

 

 

Attached Image (viewed 1658 times):

Discussion_forum_statistics.jpg

Last edited on Tue Feb 24th, 2009 04:25 pm by alchemyd

Paul Ferguson
Member


Joined: Fri Feb 15th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 1480
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 24th, 2010 10:01 am
 Quote  Reply 
Do you have some recent figures?

Paul

alchemyd
Administrator
 

Joined: Thu Sep 13th, 2007
Location: Glasgow, United Kingdom
Posts: 25
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 24th, 2010 10:17 am
 Quote  Reply 
Here are more up to date statistics:

Attached Image (viewed 1293 times):

statistics alchemy discussion4.jpg

Last edited on Mon May 24th, 2010 10:20 am by alchemyd

Alexander Guthrie Stewart
Member
 

Joined: Sat Feb 16th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 190
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 24th, 2010 05:29 pm
 Quote  Reply 
How do you find it compares to the e-mail discussion list you used to run? 

I imagine it is easier one some ways, not having to check your inbox every day, but I wonder if you're getting the same number of people through here?  Although of course numbers isn't so important, but as long as people are finding it a useful resource that is all right. 

adammclean
Member


Joined: Fri Sep 14th, 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 601
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 24th, 2010 06:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Alexander Guthrie Stewart wrote: How do you find it compares to the e-mail discussion list you used to run? 


The previous email discussion groups I organised on alchemy all degenerated into nonsense. It is a nightmare trying to deal with belief driven Jungians and esotericists.
This incarnation of the alchemy discussion group has been consistently of a high standard and everyone is courteous to one another.  If one searches the internet one can easily find other discussion groups on alchemy. These are full of posturing and nonsense as to be completely worthless.

I wonder if you're getting the same number of people through here? Although of course numbers isn't so important
I have not tried to promote the discussion group and increase the numbers of subscribers, as I know this would lead to problematic individuals joining. I know many of these people from before and they get very annoyed if you refuse them access. There are many manipulative people, in present day alchemy, driven by strange agendas, who eventually drive all the sensible people away. Indeed they usually target the major contributors, as they want to become the "leader of the pack", as they see it.

I have personally asked a number of scholars to join the group, but they never do. I can only suppose their reluctance arises from the fact that they may have had bad experiences on discussion groups in the past, or they may be reluctant to post something that may prove incorrect and then they might feel they have damaged their scholarly reputation. It is probably easier  for scholars merely to write articles, as they don't then find their ideas or research picked about in a public space. I also insist on people using their real names, and this stops some people from joining. It does, however, make people feel responsible for what they post, as they cannot hide behind some silly pseudonym.

This discussion group IS a considerable success. To see this just look at the bottom line. There have been nearly 900,000 page views over the period of two years. Consider a printed scholarly journal such as Cauda Pavonis. In the ten years of its publication have over 90,000 people even glanced at one of its pages ? I think not.



Last edited on Tue May 25th, 2010 08:00 am by adammclean

alchemyd
Administrator
 

Joined: Thu Sep 13th, 2007
Location: Glasgow, United Kingdom
Posts: 25
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Aug 1st, 2011 11:49 am
 Quote  Reply 
Here are the forum statistics updated to August 2011.

Attached Image (viewed 875 times):

Alchemy_discussion_Statistics.jpg

Last edited on Mon Aug 1st, 2011 11:59 am by alchemyd

Paul Ferguson
Member


Joined: Fri Feb 15th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 1480
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jan 11th, 2012 08:15 am
 Quote  Reply 
Hi Adam,

Any chance of an update to cover the rest of 2011? My impression is that the number of visitors has increased.

adammclean
Member


Joined: Fri Sep 14th, 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 601
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jan 11th, 2012 09:26 am
 Quote  Reply 
Here are the current statistics.

Attached Image (viewed 776 times):

statistics alchemy discussion5.jpg

Last edited on Wed Jan 11th, 2012 09:34 am by adammclean

adammclean
Member


Joined: Fri Sep 14th, 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 601
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jan 12th, 2012 02:00 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Here is a larger image. I have had to divide it into two parts due to the limitations on the size of jpegs on the board.

Attached Image (viewed 784 times):

statistics alchemy discussion5a.jpg

adammclean
Member


Joined: Fri Sep 14th, 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 601
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jan 12th, 2012 02:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The second part.

Attached Image (viewed 771 times):

statistics alchemy discussion5b.jpg

Paul Ferguson
Member


Joined: Fri Feb 15th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 1480
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Jan 22nd, 2012 03:32 pm
 Quote  Reply 
As I suspected, a steady and substantial increase. Whenever I log on viewers almost always seem to be in double figures, which must be very gratifying for you Adam given the very specialised nature of the forum.

adammclean
Member


Joined: Fri Sep 14th, 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 601
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jan 24th, 2012 11:55 am
 Quote  Reply 
As the Alchemy discussion forum provides a positive space for exploring alchemy through a scholarly perspective, it has survived and prospered. Most open discussion forums on alchemy quickly degenearate into pointless posturing and people pretending to be someone they are not.

The only thing I find is that, sadly, few scholars have joined us. Perhaps they find it worrying to engage in pursuing ideas in a forum open to the world, preferring to write formal articles. I had hoped that more would have seen this forum as a safe place in which to pursue alchemical ideas without fear of being dragged into esoteric nonsense. Perhaps, given time, they will. I wish also I had more time to engage in research and was able to make more postings here, but I find myself, at the moment, entirely buried in book publishing.

Last edited on Tue Jan 24th, 2012 11:55 am by adammclean

Paul Ferguson
Member


Joined: Fri Feb 15th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 1480
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jan 11th, 2013 06:19 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Can we see the 2012 figures?

alchemyd
Administrator
 

Joined: Thu Sep 13th, 2007
Location: Glasgow, United Kingdom
Posts: 25
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Jan 13th, 2013 12:28 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Here are the Jan 2013 statistics with data going back to 02/2010. Unfortunately the jpg is too large and the board software is resizing it and in consequence making it hard to read.

Attached Image (viewed 559 times):

statisticsJan2013.jpg

Last edited on Sun Jan 13th, 2013 12:44 pm by alchemyd

Paul Ferguson
Member


Joined: Fri Feb 15th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 1480
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Feb 10th, 2014 01:08 am
 Quote  Reply 
Can we see the 2013 figures please?


 Current time is 08:04 pm
Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez